TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report

To: Carl Moreschi <n4py@arrl.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report
From: VE1BN <ve1bn@eastlink.ca>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:52:33 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Carl -

Yes, Paul said there was a very slight chirp that he noted. His ears are a lot better than mine, obviously. I see nothing though on my Philips 120 meg scope when watching the RF output from an in-line RF sampler. Have had no one else mention a chirp. Oh yes, Paul said I have no clicks with which I concur.

73 -  Don




----- Original Message ----- From: "Carl Moreschi" <n4py@arrl.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report


So what was the final verdict.  Do you have a chirp or not?

Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Drive
Bell Mountain
Hays, NC 28635
----- Original Message ----- From: "VE1BN" <ve1bn@eastlink.ca>
To: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment"
<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2008 11:36 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report


Joe, N4YG -

I work fast (enough) CW with full QSK with my OMNI 6+ and a home brewed
linear 500 Watt QSK amplifier. QSK was added to my amp by copying the
Titan's circuitry and making the boards that were fitted into the amp some
10 years ago.  Break-in is always used here. Good to listen through when
working pileups, too.

This combined system has had no bad effect on QSK that I am aware of.
Last
evening I had an enjoyable QSO with Paul, W9AC, who broke me QSK-wise with
no problem, to make a comment.

73 -

Don,  ve1bn@eastlink.ca





----- Original Message ----- From: "N4YG" <n4yg@comcast.net>
To: "TenTec Discussion" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 17, 2008 10:58 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OMNI VI Chirp Report


> Well it seems that Don is very happy with the Logic EPROM version 1.02
> solution, but Paul says it only partially masks the problem at the
expense
> of QSK. What is the effect on QSK? I guess I will just have to try
version
> 1.02 and see for myself?
>
> Joe, N4YG
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>