To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?' |
From: | " Gene Hawkins" <ka5cnt@sbcglobal.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sun, 10 Apr 2005 08:22:43 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I know that, and a DO NOT normally let it be known but , the Tommy did say he could copy more than 20 words also in his post also, and you had no comment to that So, I though it was appropriate for this conversation! You or no one has ever seen that in any of my posts before on this reflector or anywhere else. THIS SUBJECT IS CLOSED. Gene Hawkins KA5CNT _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] popping..., Roy Koeppe |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] (no subject), Richard Donovan |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?', Bill Rowlett |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 'Real CW?', David S.McCallum |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |