| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons |
| From: | "W8BVH" <w8bvh@sbcglobal.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 30 Apr 2010 20:46:20 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
And it's made in the good ole U.S. of A. Ralph Howes W8BVH /AE----- Original Message ----- From: "Curt" <rhulett1@comcast.net> To: <tentec@contesting.com> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2010 8:31 PM Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons Well, what I've actually been looking for was something similar to the comparisons published by Sherwood Engineering, but including only the rigs Ten-Tec has built over the years. That former table lists lab measured performance info for several of the Ten-Tec rigs but not all. And, knowing the standard features, available options, commonly applied modifications, "shortcomings" ( like no RF gain control ), commonlyexperienced issues ( like needing to rebuild the PTO every few years ) wouldbe useful too. Maybe such a compendium doesn't exist, but given the large user community that's a little surprising. 73, Curt KB5JO _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.comhttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Curt |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Stuart Rohre |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Curt |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Stuart Rohre |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |