Ken,
The Paragon II has band registers and a much nicer user interface. It is
much closer to the Omni VI in operation than the Paragon. It also has a
quiter synthesizer.
Carl Moreschi N4PY
Franklinton, NC
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ken Brown" <ken.d.brown@verizon.net>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 11:56 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Paragon Question
> Hi Bob,
>
> I too have both a 585 and a 586 on my desk. I had intended to carefully
> compare the two, and then decide which one of them to offer for sale. I
> never seem to find the time to make my careful comparison. So I expect
> that I'll be keeping the 586, because it has AM TX (actually SSB with
> reinserted carrier) capability and the 585 does not. Is there any other
> significant difference in capability or performance between the two
> rigs? If you had to choose between two 585s, or two 586s, or the
> combination that you do have, what pair would you choose, and why?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ken N6KB
>
> >The 585 is a Paragon. There is no such critter as a Paragon I. The
Paragon
> >II is a 586. I have both on my desk.
> >
> >73
> >Bob, K4TAX
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|