TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 13:00:06 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yes!

Tom - W4BQF

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Ynkedragon@aol.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 9:29 AM
Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK


> In a message dated 08/17/2004 07:03:15 Eastern Daylight Time, 
> aldermant@alltel.net writes:
> 
> << I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated, that employ
>  digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at speed over 40 wpm.
>  Especially Ten Tec radios. >>
> 
> Using the internal or an external keyer?
> 
> k3yd
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>