TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] Receivability

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] Receivability
From: Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com (Gary Hoffman)
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 20:09:30 -0500
Absolutely agree on all points Lee.

Wish I could afford an Orion right away.  Sure did drool
over them at the hamfest !  :)

Gary


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "WA3FIY" <wa3fiy@radioadv.com>
To: "George, W5YR" <w5yr@att.net>
Cc: <TenTec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:39 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Receivability


> On 28 Oct 2002 at 22:19, George, W5YR wrote:
> 
> > Very interesting, Gary, and thanks!
> > 
> > I have made detailed spectral comparisons between the IF DSP filters
> > in the ICom 756 PRO, the Kachina 505DSP of similar architecture and
> > the Icom 765 with conventional crystal filters. There is no comparison
> > whatever between the shape factors and overall shapes of the PRO
> > filters compared to any of the others. The PRO filters are
> > mathemeticallu nigh perfect in shape and performance. I think that you
> > have found that the Pegasus IF DSP filters are not the equal to the
> > conventional INRAD filters - that is very surprising to me.
> > 
> If you put things in perspective, I don't think it's at all 
> surprising that 20 poles of Inrad in a Corsair and the DSP 
> filtering of the PRO are superior to the Pegasus.   It all boils 
> down to one word..........COST.
> 
> In the first place I don't believe TT intended the Pegasus to be 
> a serious contest radio, and did not design it for that purpose.  
> In it's day and even today if you discount it's lack of digital 
> VFO's etc and add 20 poles of Inrad filtering, the Corsair is a 
> contest radio.
> 
> The Kachina and 'PRO both have more DSP horsepower to apply 
> to the filtering process so they too should be superior in that 
> regard.
> 
> The Pegasus on the other hand at approximately 1/3 the cost of 
> the 'PRO and 1/2 the cost of the Kachina, uses one 16 bit [I 
> think] DSP processor to not only do the filtering functions, but 
> also to control all other digital activity.  So it has a limited 
> amount of time to devote to filtering and then goes on to other 
> assignments.  Only Ten Tec knows if it is maxed out or not.   Add 
> an outboard SCAF or DSP filter and you will be close to the 
> performance of the other radios and still be under their cost.
> 
> The Orion of course is designed to be a contest grade radio and 
> addresses these matters by giving the receivers two 32 bit DSP 
> processors and two general purpose microprocessors to take 
> care of other matters.   No lack of horsepower here, and from 
> the looks of things, it will give Gary's Inrad Corsair a good run 
> for its money.   :-).
> 
> -73-
> 
> -Lee-
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>