TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Frequency Display Problem Only On LSB

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Frequency Display Problem Only On LSB
From: "Paul Christensen" <w9ac@arrl.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2011 08:56:27 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Don't be too surprised if after alignment, USB sounds noticeably "thinner." 
One reason for this occurrence is an asymmetrical passband of the stock 2.4 
kHz filter  It's been a very long time (Spring, 1998 to be exact), when I 
asked INRAD to produce the 2.8kHz @ 9 MHz filter.  As I recall, their filter 
has significantly better passband symmetry.

Here's a quick test:  After alignment, momentarily short out the 2.4K @ 9 
MHz filter with buss wire.  Listen for differences in audio passband 
characteristics between U/LSB.  If that re-establishes symmetry, you may 
want to consider the INRAD filter as a replacement if it's still available.

Paul, W9AC

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Barry N1EU" <barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 8:40 AM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Frequency Display Problem Only On LSB


> Adjustment is made to the TX Audio Board, p4-23 of the manual
>
> 73/GL, Barry N1EU
>
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Tom Stone <sail8@verizon.net> wrote:
>> Berry,
>>
>> I set it up as you described below and yes, I can hear a distinct change 
>> when I switch from USB to LSB.
>> Do you have any idea where the BFOs are located, which board? Hopefully, 
>> Chapter 4 of the Manual will provide
>> enough detail to locate them.
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com 
>> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Barry N1EU
>> Sent: Friday, June 10, 2011 6:55 AM
>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Frequency Display Problem Only On LSB
>>
>> With PBT control centered at 12 o'clock, tune the Omni 6 to a clear
>> frequency such that band noise is clearly audible. Switch back and
>> forth between USB and LSB. Does the tonal balance of the noise
>> (bass/treble) sound the same between the two modes? If it doesn't,
>> this is more evidence that the BFO oscillators need alignment to bring
>> them into balance.
>>
>> 73, Barry N1EU
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 10:24 PM, Tom Stone <sail8@verizon.net> wrote:
>>> Carl,
>>>
>>> Is that something I can locate and adjust using Chapter 4 of the manual? 
>>> I
>>> guess if I have to ask, the answer is "no".... :)
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: tentec-bounces@contesting.com 
>>> [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com]
>>> On Behalf Of Carl Moreschi
>>> Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2011 10:17 PM
>>> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
>>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] Omni VI+ Frequency Display Problem Only On LSB
>>>
>>> The internal BFO frequency adjustment for LSB is off 250 hertz.
>>>
>>> Carl Moreschi N4PY
>>> 121 Little Bell Dr.
>>> Hays, NC 28635
>>> www.n4py.com
>>>
>>> On 6/9/2011 9:59 PM, Tom Stone wrote:
>>>> Has any owner of an Omni VI+ ever had a problem similar to this? (With 
>>>> the
>>>> RIT off, Identical Side tone and Pass Band Tuning set at zero on both
>>> rigs)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Switching between my Orion II and Omni VI+ using an Alpha Delta switch 
>>>> on
>>>> the same antenna. The Omni was just serviced by Ten Tec.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 160M - LSB - Orion II 1.900.000 For the same voice quality (sounds the
>>> same)
>>>> the Omni had to be tuned to 1.899.75
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 80M - LSB - Orion II 3.868.000 For the same voice quality (sounds the
>>> same)
>>>> the Omni had to be tuned to 3.867.75
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Question: What could account for the consistent .25 difference in the
>>>> frequency read out? There is no difference when I am in the USB
>>> mode.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Would appreciate any available input.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 73, Tom N3XQ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>