TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?

To: "'Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment'" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
From: "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2014 21:59:21 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Kim you are correct, they don't need QSK like we do.
Nobody is dumb enough to try and take over their frequency (hi).

As I said, we had lots of trouble with PIN-Diodes and went back to what we
know works.

Yes, got your email and marked it as unread again (so I can find it again -
hi).
I have been sick with the flu for a week.  Today's the first day I'm really
back in the saddle, but way behind on answering emails... especially
business emails.

I will answer directly (soon).

73 - Rick, DJ0IP
(Nr. Frankfurt am Main)


-----Original Message-----
From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kim Elmore
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 9:45 PM
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
Cc: Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP
Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?

I don't think the big multi-multis care about QSK, anyway. The ones I know
of run semi. As for Germany alas, no. I'd love to have a go, though! :)

PIN diode switches are, in the end, probably not suited to multi-multi
stations, anyway as they won't tolerate big mismatches. I have the Ameritron
QSK5 internal switches on both my amps and I've blown the receive fuses in
them a couple of times because I selected the wrong antenna in the heat of
battle. I've never been in enough RF for them to cause problems, though I'm
sure it can happen. Outside of that, I've found them quite reliable.

Rick, did you ever receive my reply about Oklahoma?

Kim N5OP

On 3/17/2014 3:19 PM, Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP wrote:
> Kim, apparently you have never operated a multi-multi station with 6 
> stations running 1.5kW at the same time, within a few hundred yards of 
> each other.
> And you must not have had Pin Diode switching in Germany because the 
> RF power in the air at night is significant.
> It slightly forward biases the diodes and they cause intermodulation 
> distortion.
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kim 
> Elmore
> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 8:09 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
>
> I was thinking more along lines for amplifier switching. I have PIN 
> diode switches in both of my amps. There are a few AM BC stations 
> within a few miles of me - one is a 50 kW blowtorch and the others are 
> 1 to 5 kW. I've never heard any overload problems attributable to the PIN
diode switches.
> There's only one ham nearby (about 2.5 mi away) who can run 1.5 kW and 
> I've never heard anything attributable to the switches then, either. The
"on"
> bias for the rx diodes runs about 100 mA or so and the source voltage 
> is 12 V.
>
> I can't claim that they can't generate problems (kW field day ops 
> might well create some as might big multi-multi stations) but I can 
> claim that I've never encountered any.
>
> Kim N5OP
>
>
> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long 
> as the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>
>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 13:51, Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>
>> Because relays don't cause receive overload problems when very strong
> signals saturate the pin diodes.
>> Carl Moreschi N4PY
>> 58 Hogwood Rd
>> Louisburg, NC 27549
>> www.n4py.com
>>
>>> On 3/17/2014 2:14 PM, Kim Elmore wrote:
>>> Why use relays when we have PIN diodes?
>>>
>>> Kim N5OP
>>>
>>> "People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long 
>>> as the music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith
>>>
>>>> On Mar 17, 2014, at 11:43, "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP"<Rick@DJ0IP.de>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Different relays have different life cycles.
>>>> AND, keep in mind that this spec was specified for a relay when 
>>>> switching between two STABLE STATES.
>>>>
>>>> If you run full QSK with the relay following the keying, sometimes 
>>>> the relay is in transition when it gets a command to go the other 
>>>> way.  It must overcome inertia and change directions. THIS IS 
>>>> ADDITIONAL WEAR AND TEAR on the relay.
>>>> THIS type of operation is not considered in the specs.
>>>>
>>>> Also, when Phil wrote that paper on QSK, he was referring to the 
>>>> open-frame relay used in ALL Ameritron amplifiers.
>>>> I guarantee you that this relay will  NEVER WEAR OUT  when trying 
>>>> to follow QSK keying. . .
>>>> BECAUSE IT WILL BURN UP LONG BEFORE IT WEARS OUT! (hi)
>>>>
>>>> UNFORTUNATELY AMERITRON IS HOPELESSLY BEHIND THE POWER CURVE WITH 
>>>> THEIR DEPLOYMENT OF THIS RELAY!
>>>>
>>>> I would remind people at this point to keep in mind that there are 
>>>> 3 VERY different kinds of relays used for T/R switching in the 
>>>> linear amplifiers that we use.  The differences are HUGE!
>>>> You'll find pictures and short description of these on my web site,
>>>> Here:
>>>> http://www.dj0ip.de/ten-tec-stuff/misc-stuff/linear-amp-relays/
>>>>
>>>> ALTHOUGH AMERITRON publishes a switching time of 15mS for its 
>>>> relays and [falsely] advertises them as "fast- nearly as fast as 
>>>> some QSK
> relays"
>>>> [puke], these relays are DIRT SLOW.
>>>> In reality they switch with 17 to 20mS delay, depending on the
> situation.
>>>> *** AS MEASURED LAST WEEK BY BOB, K4TAX. ***
>>>>
>>>> Phil is absolutely right!
>>>> (sorry Gary)
>>>>
>>>> NEVER-THE-LESS, there is still a way to have near QSK with the slow 
>>>> Ameritron Amps (without the expensive QSK-5) and still hear in 
>>>> between words; just not in between dit, dahs, or characters.  It's 
>>>> just a matter of proper time sequencing.  I've been doing it with 
>>>> these
> amps for 30+ years.
>>>> As long as you can hear between words, there is no tangible 
>>>> disadvantage between QSK that can hear between dits.  OK, perhaps 
>>>> you notice someone is transmitting when you are...  1/10 second 
>>>> later than with true full QSK.  If you are willing to accept this, 
>>>> you
> can avoid burning the relay.
>>>> In order to do this, you will need an external keyer that has 
>>>> adjustable time sequencing.  There are a few of these on the market 
>>>> (i.e., WINKEY, MFJ-495, etc.) AND several rig interface boxes such 
>>>> as the "MicroHam MicroKeyer II" have adjustable delay (time
>>>> sequencing) parameters.  If you understand the timing, it's a piece 
>>>> of cake to set this up.  With devices like that, you may use any 
>>>> keyer -
> EXCEPT the rig's own built-in keyer.
>>>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>>>> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of 
>>>> GARY HUBER
>>>> Sent: Monday, March 17, 2014 4:40 PM
>>>> To: TenTec Reflector
>>>> Subject: [TenTec] QSK or not?
>>>>
>>>> I operate QSK and have the past thirty years using TenTec equipment.
>>>>
>>>> One reason given by others for not running QSK is that the relays 
>>>> wear out sooner in the transceiver and amplifier.
>>>>
>>>> from
>>>> http://www.ad5x.com/images/Presentations/QSKals500als600RevA.pdf
>>>>
>>>> How Long will the Relays Last?
>>>> What kind of life can you expect from the relays? The relay life is 
>>>> specified at 100 million operations minimum at 36,000 
>>>> operations/hour. The service life increases as the operations/hour 
>>>> decreases. So let's use the standard PARIS text that is used for
> determining code speed.
>>>> PARIS has 10 dits and 4 dahs = 14 relay operations/minute at 1 WPM.
>>>>
>>>> Assuming an average of 25WPM code speed, you would have 360 relay 
>>>> operations per minute. So, 100 million operations = 4630 hours. Now 
>>>> you normally operate 50% transmitting and 50% receiving during a 
>>>> QSO, so your relay operating time should double to 9260 hours. 
>>>> There are 8760 hours/year, which means you could operate 1.057 
>>>> years at 25 WPM before the relays exceeded their lifetime spec - IF 
>>>> you operate
>>>> 24 hours/day! But when you operate, you are probably listening more 
>>>> like 75% of the time and in a QSO 25% of the time. So this says 
>>>> that your relay operating life will be over 4- years if you operate 
>>>> 24 hours/day. So what do you normally average in operating 
>>>> time/day? I bet it is not more than about an hour/day. But let's 
>>>> say you average
>>>> 4- hours/day of operation (i.e. you are not married and have no 
>>>> kids, you don't shop or eat or sleep much, and you don't hold a 
>>>> full-time job). So the relay life will extend to about
>>>> 25 years! The bottom line - Don't worry about wearing out the 
>>>> relays anytime soon.
>>>>
>>>> 73 ES DX,
>>>> Gary - AB9M    -...-.-
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> TenTec mailing list
>>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> TenTec mailing list
>>> TenTec@contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>