To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm? |
From: | "n4dsp" <n4dsp@triad.rr.com> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Wed, 20 Dec 2006 16:48:49 -0500 |
List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Perry, Dont be such a Downer!! Geez congratulate the guy for this remarkable achievement! Next thing someone will comment that the program does not have real life conditions like qsb, qrm etc. john-n4dsp > Did anyone miss the criteria for this competition? The only thing > they have to receive is "call signs." No text. You know that there > will be at least one number with letters before and after. This > allows competitors to narrow their concentration and up their scores. > > Ya think Ted McElroy would condone this limited style of copying? :-) > > Perry w8au _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Early Ten-Tec Service Note, SN-2-540,detailing Triton IV mod to eliminate RX/TX reed relay'malfunctions' in earlier serial number rigs, MICHAEL SOUHRADA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm?, John Vickers |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm?, w8au |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] 200 wpm?, John Vickers |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |