TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2004 20:21:22 -0000
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Tom

Yes I monitored rf output with a seperate receiver.  I've sent you two .wav
files of what my Orion produces at 60 wpm.

Bob

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 5:07 PM
Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK


> Since you are a very astute ham Bob, I will just assume you did that while
> listening to your Orion on a different receiver. The Orion's sidetone
works
> OK at 70 wpm, but the two Orions I have certainly will not send correctly
> timed/spaced CW over about 50 wpm. No one that  I have sent CW at speeds
> over 50 wpm can copy it because the timing is so messed up. And it is not
my
> PC or DGM keyboard since I have  asked two fellow hams to try  their
Orions
> at 50 and 60 wpm, with the same results.
>
> I agree, I don't know anyone, except a few German hams, who send at 70 wpm
> with a keyer.
>
> Tom - W4BQF
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Henderson" <bob@cytanet.com.cy>
> To: <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 10:06 AM
> Subject: [spam] Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
>
>
> > Tom
> >
> > You have me confused now for sure!
> >
> > When you say you "can work around" the QSK switching issue, does that
mean
> > by not bothering with QSK or do you have a cunning work around that
hasn't
> > occurred to me?
> >
> > I have just run my Orion at 70 wpm for half an hour and I don't hear
> > anything wrong with the code sent.  Incidentally, I did not use the
> internal
> > keyer.
> >
> > Bob, 5B4AGN
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Tommy" <aldermant@alltel.net>
> > To: "Jim Brown" <jim@audiosystemsgroup.com>; <tentec@contesting.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 11:02 AM
> > Subject: Re: [spam] Re: [TenTec] The QSK of QSK
> >
> >
> > > I don't have an issue with the QSK switching, one can work around
that.
> > What
> > > I have an issue with is that most radios I have operated, that employ
> > > digital techniques, do not send CW correctly at speed over 40 wpm.
> > > Especially Ten Tec radios.
> > >
> > > Tom - W4BQF
> > >
> > >
> > > > I do it differently -- that is, I try to use radios that give me the
> > > maximum
> > > > time between dits to listen. And part of what I think W4BQF is
> > > > complaining about with high speed CW may be that some radios just
> > > > don't switch fast enough.
> > > >
> > > > Jim  K9YC
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > TenTec mailing list
> > > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > TenTec mailing list
> > > TenTec@contesting.com
> > > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TenTec mailing list
> > TenTec@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>