TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] DZkit HF Transceiver

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] DZkit HF Transceiver
From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 15:58:15 -0600
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Oh, make no mistake! I’m with you, Rick. I saw a review somewhere on an 
Elecraft  reflector that put some numbers on rx performance and, based on that, 
I expect the rx to fold in a serious contest environment. 

Like you, if I had $5k of spare change floating about and a couple hundred 
hours to kill, it would probably be a fun project, but... I have neither. Looks 
good ergonomically, has some nice features, probably does a good job well away 
from Big Guns, but it’s not an economical choice. 

If ya just gotta build it yourself, you want good/very good analog performance, 
and money plus time are no object... He should go right ahead!

73,

Kim N5OP

"People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the 
music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith

> On Nov 14, 2017, at 11:15, <Rick@dj0ip.de> <Rick@dj0ip.de> wrote:
> 
> Well Kim, reading eham is, like almost always, a total joke.
> Guys giving it a 5 are hyping the fact that it has Collins mechanical filters.
> These are basically "CR@P" by today's standards.
> 
> They are 1960's technology, and were great for the money, considering the 
> cost of crystal filters back then.
> Crystal filters are much better, have steeper slopes, deeper ultimate 
> attenuation, etc.
> 
> Modern DSP filters are as much better than crystal filters than crystal 
> filters were better than mechanical filters.
> 
> Using filters with wide flanks will always sound better than using filters 
> with steep flanks.
> 
> These guys should try the radios in a big contest like CQWW DX.
> I'm sure they will sing a different song after that.
> 
> I am not down on the DZ radio, I am just stating what I believe to be facts.
> I think it is great that this radio kit is offered and if I had the time and 
> spare change, I would enjoy building one.
> It would be interesting to learn how its front-end performs here in Europe..
> I also like the ergonomics of the DZ.
> And for a non-contester or rag chewer, it may be the bee's knees.
> But the price is over the top.
> 
> I would dearly love to try one.  Have wanted to for over 10 years, but 
> unfortunately that is price prohibitive for me.
> 
> 73
> Rick, DJ0IP
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Kimberly 
> Elmore
> Sent: 14 November 2017 17:54
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] DZkit HF Transceiver
> 
> There are reviews of the SIenna transceiver, but none from QST or Sherwood 
> Engineering. Simply google "dzkit sienna review" and you'll find some. From 
> what I've read, it's a nice rig and has many admirable features. You 
> certainly won't save any money buying a fully decked out kit, but if you 
> enjoy kit building you'll probably be happy with it. Kim N5OP
> 
>      From: Dry Martini Holding Company😎 <qrp@kg4kgl.net>
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 6:36 AM
> Subject: [TenTec] DZkit HF Transceiver
> 
> I see others talk about various brands other than ten-tec from time to time. 
> I was wondering if anyone had any experience with the DZ Transceiver our of 
> Colorado?
> 
> Tnx,
> 
> Robert
> KG4KGL
> 
> 
>> On Nov 13, 2017, at 12:08, Katz Ajamas <ajamas.rn@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> I'm looking for the manufacturer and PN for the band data connector on 
>> the Hercules 2. (Tentec 420). PN in manual does not appear in Molex 
>> catalog. I do not know if it is a Molex connector. I can work around 
>> it but prefer to find a source for the connector.
>> 
>> Thanks, 73 -Bob ah7i/w4
>> --
>> -do not look into LASER with remaining eye!
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>