TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] (no subject)

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] (no subject)
From: Sam <veast1@charter.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 14:41:21 -0800
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Actually since i have done it, it's pretty simple .... as stated in
another reply.  John, if you will send me your mailing address i will be
happy to send the INRAD information to you.

73 - Paul (N6MYA)





> ARRL measured rx audio passband of 1630hz on the 6+ due to af
> circuitry so a wider i.f. filter isn't going to buy you THAT much on
> receive.  If you want more fidelity, the 6+ isn't a great choice
> without some invasive mods (bypassing af circuit).
> 
> 73,
> Barry N1EU
> 
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 11:32 PM, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson
> <geraldj@weather.net> wrote:
> > On Sun, 2010-01-17 at 17:20 -0500, John Peters wrote:
> >>   I have a omni VI+ coming and it is hard to wait for the
> delivery....
> >>      I would like to know where I may get the 2.8 kc filters.  I
> have heard
> >> that the SSB is a little narrow and I would like it a little wider
> than 2.4 kc
> >> in one or two in the filter positions .....  any comments greatly
> app.
> >>        Thanks      John       K2lot
> >> _______________________________________________
> >
> > After using a Collins S-line on SSB, I think 2.4 is a bit wide.
> Collins
> > used a 2.1 standard.
> >
> > Don't forget that you have to realign the BFO and its warps to use
> the wider filter.
> >
> > More filters are available from TenTec and Inrad.
> >
> > 73, Jerry, K0CQ
> >
> > ___________________________________________

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>