TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] 3KC Spacing / K0CQ reply

To: tentec@contesting.com
Subject: [TenTec] 3KC Spacing / K0CQ reply
From: KD7EFQ@aol.com
Reply-to: tentec@contesting.com
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 14:47:02 EST
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Ok, Maybe it's not a "Rule", But someone once told me it was common courtesy 
to not move closer than 3kc's to an occupied freq. Maybe an old gentlemen's 
agreement that is no longer observed. Of course nobody cares today if they move 
within 1or 2 kc's of an ongoing qso and overlaps into and interrupts stations 
that were already in progress. It happens all the time on 75meters & 20 
Meters. I am talking SSB now, NOT CW. I don't operate CW.
And if you ask people to move, they generally ignore you, or argue that they 
were there first
when you didn't hear them when you started. Some is due to propagation 
changes, but more often I find it's rude operators rather than propagation 
changes. 
People think they own
a particular frequency when it IS in the rules that it's a first come, first 
serve basis.

As far as the INRAD Mod goes, it states that:

1: The 2.8 6.3 if filter reduces or eliminates passband ripple over the stock 
2.4 filter
which before the mod is greater than 2db.

2: the low end response is improved to about 250-300 hz at -3db whereas the 
stock spec
is up at 350-400hz at -3db.

3: The response is only tipped down towards the high side from the low side 
approx 2.5
to 3db wheras before the mod there is about 8 or 9 db of high frequency loss 
from 500hz
to 2500hz.

That's from the mod sheet. Is George at Inrad lying to help his pocketbook? 
73, Todd KD7EFQ
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>