To: | <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [TenTec] antenna |
From: | ku3g@yahoo.com (no body) |
Date: | Mon, 1 Apr 2002 11:23:39 -0800 (PST) |
this antenna is not really that new, back in the 60's a company, whose name i can not remember , mad a 40m dipole using the same principle, they work and i'm sure will keep the swr down, but i feel not worth the additional cost 73's john ku3g --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Greetings - send greetings for Easter, Passover --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts --- multipart/alternative text/plain (text body -- kept) text/html --- |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [TenTec] re: new fangeled antenna, Tim Ahrens |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [TenTec] thanks for your responses concerning "fluid motion antenna ", KB2HUK@aol.com |
Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] re: new fangeled antenna, Tim Ahrens |
Next by Thread: | [TenTec] thanks for your responses concerning "fluid motion antenna ", KB2HUK@aol.com |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |