PA5MW wrote:
> Oh and Tom is using FT1000MP's during contesting at his station, NOT the
K3 (as far as I recall from his latest message).
Mark your information is out of date by ~1 year. If you
want to read Tom's review, it's on page 9 of the eHam K3 reviews
written August 25, 2008 (see below):
http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/6673?page=9
> Please forgive me my words above. I'm being rude here and expressing my
frustration.
But I have seen too much of messages from you and others having such
content and I do not like it.
I will refrain from further comment in this discussion as I am adding to
the band noise now too.
Please recall that you actually began this thread on the
Ten-tec list by promoting what I feel was a rather questionable
review of the K3. I have the benefit of having read (too much) G4ILO
on the Elecraft list. For the record, he has now stated:
"If so, then it seems as if all of my main annoyances with the K3 are
going to be addressed very soon. :) "
http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/elecraft/2009-September/116203.html
Perhaps G4ILO simply needs a little more patience. Elecraft is
probably the most responsive radio manufacturer today and certainly
does not deserve whining reviews...or their promotion.
73, Bill W4ZV
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|