| To: | "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons |
| From: | "Hulett, Russell" <rhulett1@consolidated.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Sat, 1 May 2010 07:31:37 -0500 (CDT) |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Jerry, Thanks for the summary, that is the sort have been looking for, and it prompts a few questions: Which of the Ten-Tec rigs marked the change from "conventional" radios to "computer with knobs"? Having owned an Argonaut V and now an Omni VII, I know both of those use "bootloaders, firmware, and digital processing". Somehow I thought the Paragon was the first where software and digitial processing played a major role, is that correct? Besides the Omni VII, I own a 505, 509, 540, 544, and 546. I enjoy all of them, though the 505 is in need of a PTO rebuild. How do the features of the 560 and 561 compare with the 546? 73, Curt KB5JO |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, kris |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [TenTec] FS: 219 Filter, Nathan Moreschi |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, kris |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons, Dr. Gerald N. Johnson |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |