Gentlemen:
I run a Omni VI+ on 160M using a 1/2 wave center fed dipole. While I do
engage the 20 dB attenuator on the input, I haven't observed any problem
with overload. Even with my neighbor at about 12 miles running a Triton
on 160M slightly down band I've observed no problems. However the
excessive use of the NB does create some splatter. But with no pulse
noise why have the NB turned on. I don't use it unless it's needed.
Happy with mine the way it is.
73
Bob K4TAX
Alexander Mitch LG-AT wrote:
>
> Gentlemen:
>
> There is currently a lively discussion going on the 'topband' reflector
> regarding the best receivers for 160m. A particular exerpt piqued my
> interest:
>
> >>It is important to note however, that the stock Omni VI+ is hampered by
> limited dynamic range. I heard from one source (unfortunatly too late) that
> replacing the 15khz roofing filter of the Omni with a 2.4khz xtal filter
> will significantly improve its BDR. The stock Omni BDR tests about 15-20dB
> less than its competition in the ARRL reviews.
>
> I currently run an Omni V on HF. Any comments to the above?
>
> 73 --
>
> Mitch KJ4DX
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/FAQ/tentec
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
|