Was surprised to see that TT re-designed their web site:
http://www.tentec.com
Cool. :)
Still no on-line ordering, though. :(
Casey Bahr, KS7J, FISTS #3648From owner-tentec@contesting.com Wed Jun 3
18:19:32 1998
Received: by dayton.akorn.net (TLB v0.10a (1.23 tibbs 1997/01/09 00:29:32));
Wed, 03 Jun 1998 18:19:32 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <000801bd8f3d$79c9fea0$613471d1@dale>
From: "Dale L. Martin" <kg5u@hal-pc.org>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] WOW! New look to TT Site!
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 1998 17:17:52 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4
Sender: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Precedence: bulk
X-Sponsor: W4AN, KM3T, N5KO & AD1C
Very nice. Well laid out and lots of good information.
Not to be picky, but I'm curious as to why the Omni VI+ on the
Home Page is on 7.176 MHz, but no microphone is plugged in.
Ten-Tec's claim to fame is GREAT CW. Although the SSB is great,
too, the CW (and the customer service) is the hallmark of
Ten-Tec's reputation.
And why is the RIT 0.85 kHz off zero-beat frequency? Is that the
standard offset for LSB? Is that why so many stations call me
off frequency so often?
But, hey! The LSB button was selected.
:-)
Good job on the website, Ten-Tec!
73,
dale, kg5u
-----Original Message-----
From: Bahr, Casey <casey.bahr@intel.com>
To: 'tentec@contesting.com' <tentec@contesting.com>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Wednesday, June 03, 1998 14:16 PM
Subject: [TenTec] WOW! New look to TT Site!
>Was surprised to see that TT re-designed their web site:
>http://www.tentec.com
>
>Cool. :)
>
--
FAQ on WWW: http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions: tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests: tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems: owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search: http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm
|