On 6/4/2012 7:31 PM, chacuff wrote:
That's what I keep a Drake R8B around for...Neither the old RX or the new
one will work as well.
Cecil
K5DL
----- Original Message -----
From:<kc9cdt@aol.com>
To:<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, June 04, 2012 6:06 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] rx 366
Nope,
The actuaal guy at TT that did a lot of the testing told me it is not as
good on GC.
Can't remember the specifics...but you could contact TT for the details.
He told me for SWL, keep the original second RX...
He is also the one that did the testing of the install procedures.
But a SX-28 (and others) is so much better for that anyways...probably
doesn't matter to most.
The TT Orion II is the only modern rig I have...all the others are vintage
(Collins, Drake, Halli, Johnson, National)
73,
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Barry N1EU<barry.n1eu@gmail.com>
To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment<tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Mon, Jun 4, 2012 5:58 pm
Subject: Re: [TenTec] rx 366
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:16 PM,<kc9cdt@aol.com> wrote:
I was told that it is GC, but the original second RX was a little better
in
hat mode..
I suspect the RX366 is actually a BETTER gc rx in all respects than
he original except for out of band rejection. That's also assuming
ou have the appropriate roofing filter installed (original didn't
eed roofing filters).
But I could be wrong.
Barry N1EU
______________________________________________
enTec mailing list
enTec@contesting.com
ttp://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
Thanks for all the responses . John kb2huk
|