TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

[TenTec] OMNI-6 Filter Blow-by

To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: [TenTec] OMNI-6 Filter Blow-by
From: dacalvin@us.ibm.com (Duane Calvin)
Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:15:19 -0400
Yes, the FT-1000 and the FT-1000MP are completely different rigs...

 73,  Duane   AC5AA

Duane A. Calvin
Server Systems Test Engineer
Dept. 76TS   RS/6000 - SP Nodes
Austin, TX      >O<     Tie: 793-3368



owner-tentec@contesting.com on 09/11/98 10:59:22 AM
Please respond to owner-tentec@contesting.com
To: tentec@contesting.com, seay@alaska.net
cc:
Subject: RE: [TenTec] OMNI-6 Filter Blow-by



Del Seay wrote:
<clip>
From: Del Seay
To: tentec
Subject: [TenTec] OMNI-6 Filter Blow-by
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Friday, September 11, 1998 8:15AM

In response to Lee's question about filters and the OMNI 6 use
in a heavy rf environment:

Now - let's look at the Yeasu FT-1000 with the mechanical filters. Much
lower total attenuation numbers than the standard TenTec filters.
Mechanical filters were never found to have a great out of bandpass
attenuation. Their advantage was .......

<snip>

The Yaesu FT-1000 does not use mechanical filters.  Their
filters are CRYSTAL filters.

Karl Kanalz - W8TIF
McKinney, TX

--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm





--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/tentecfaq.htm
Submissions:              tentec@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  tentec-REQUEST@contesting.com
Problems:                 owner-tentec@contesting.com
Search:                   http://www.contesting.com/km9p/search.htm


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>