| To: | tentec@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Argonaut VI and 418 |
| From: | Jim Lowman <jmlowman@sbcglobal.net> |
| Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 28 Dec 2012 17:45:17 -0800 |
| List-post: | <mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
Lee, why not spend a few bucks more and get the Eagle, unless you plan
to take the 539/418 pair out of the shack?
With the Eagle, you get a better receiver, more filter slots, full 160-6m coverage, and an available internal ATU. All of those have been criticisms of the Argonaut VI. 73 de Jim - AD6CW On 12/28/2012 7:54 AM, Lee WA3FIY wrote: Greetings all, Anyone here using the Argonaut VI / 418 combination? If so what are your impressions so far? I'm thinking that might be a nice replacement for the Jupiter. 73, -Lee- WA3FIY |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Corsair II Mixer Balance Adjustment, K4MT |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Orion II: nothing at startup, Rodney |
| Previous by Thread: | [TenTec] Argonaut VI and 418, Lee WA3FIY |
| Next by Thread: | [TenTec] Omni V.9 dead on 20m RX and TX, Bob Towers |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |