To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters |
From: | Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net> |
Reply-to: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 09 Nov 2013 22:49:07 +0000 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
True - but in the situation being discussed the high SWR on the short
length of coax is being caused by the load at the balun/ladderline.
Arguably that high SWR is more likely to be a high impedance mismatch
than a low impedance one.
Steve G3TXQ On 09/11/2013 22:37, Joel Hallas wrote: Of course, many short 160 meter antennas have a very low Z, and thus this case is not relevant, but that doesn't keep Steve's assertion from being correct, and worth keeping in mind--SWR isn't the whole picture. _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Carl Moreschi |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Carl Moreschi |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |