To: | Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters |
From: | Carl Moreschi <n4py3@earthlink.net> |
Reply-to: | n4py3@earthlink.net, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com> |
Date: | Sat, 09 Nov 2013 17:55:26 -0500 |
List-post: | <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com> |
I say it's 50-50 whether it's a high impedance or low impedance at the
coax connection point. We don't know how long the open wire line is so
the high SWR line could have rotated to anything that would produce that
particular SWR.
Carl Moreschi N4PY 58 Hogwood Rd Louisburg, NC 27549 www.n4py.com On 11/9/2013 5:49 PM, Steve Hunt wrote: True - but in the situation being discussed the high SWR on the short length of coax is being caused by the load at the balun/ladderline. Arguably that high SWR is more likely to be a high impedance mismatch than a low impedance one. Steve G3TXQ On 09/11/2013 22:37, Joel Hallas wrote:Of course, many short 160 meter antennas have a very low Z, and thus this case is not relevant, but that doesn't keep Steve's assertion from being correct, and worth keeping in mind--SWR isn't the whole picture._______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec _______________________________________________ TenTec mailing list TenTec@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec |
Previous by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Mike Bryce |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Steve Hunt |
Next by Thread: | Re: [TenTec] Ten Tec 238 coupler and 160 meters, Jim Brown |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |