TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group -tuner and dipoles

To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] OT: Question to the group -tuner and dipoles
From: Steve Hunt <steve@karinya.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 14:42:31 +0100
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
A couple of observations:

1) It would benefit from an effective ferrite-cored choke balun at the input rather than the narrowband air-cored balun that he suggests.

2) Apart from the balun, the CM performance is critically dependent on symmetrical construction of the matching components. If you force current balance at the input using the balun, but then have asymmetry in the following matching components, you will guarantee asymmetrical currents at the output terminals. The very worst example I have seen of this is the Palstar BT1500A where on the higher frequency bands they switch out most of the rotor vanes but leave the static vanes in circuit and close to the chassis!!!! As you might imagine the CM impedance turns out to be mediocre.

Steve G3TXQ

On 19/07/2016 13:22, Steve Elliston wrote:
do we like:
"A *Balanced* Balanced Antenna Tuner
By Richard L. Measures, AG6K
The published version of this article appeared in the February 1990 issue
of QST Magazine." ?
73
Steve
G3XKR




_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>