TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons
From: "Gary Hoffman" <ghoffman@spacetech.com>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 22:58:58 -0400
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Yep, it sure is.

I want "enough" bandwidth to be passed by the radio so that I can tailor it 
afterwards - for MY ears - by using
my add-on filters.  That means, to me, that the rig ought to pass about 250 
to 2800 Hz audio without impairment.

I usually filter out the lows then, and tend to boost the mids, which I 
don't hear well anymore, and filter out the REAL high,
to cut down on the annoying high frequency noise that contains no 
intelligence.

As for transmit, I don't want Hi Fi.  I want Punch, because I work only 
contests.  So thats my day to day environment.

Your milage will vary for sure !

73 de Gary, AA2IZ


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stuart Rohre" <rohre@arlut.utexas.edu>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 29, 2010 8:17 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Ten-Tec Rig Comparisons


> Like I said audio is subjective.
> -Stuart
>
>> I want punch on my transmitter, not my receiver, thank you very much.
>> I want the receiver to act as a faithful transducer with the freedom
>> to shape the passband as I desire, not hard-wired to restrict that
>> ability.
>>
>> 73, Barry N1EU
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>