TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Comparison of Ten Tec Orion II with Flex 500A

To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Comparison of Ten Tec Orion II with Flex 500A
From: "N4PY2" <n4py2@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: N4PY2 <n4py2@earthlink.net>, Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:37:58 -0400
List-post: <mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
The big thing with Flex is the panadapter. The SSB performance of both the Orion and Flex 5000 is great. My software can easily provide a great panadapter for the Orion with LP-Pan if you want to do the VE7TK mod, or with an inexpensize Flex 1500 without the mod.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Drive
Hays, NC 28635
www.n4py.com


----- Original Message ----- From: "Frank Kirschner" <frank@fkirschner.net> To: "N4PY2" <n4py2@earthlink.net>; "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Comparison of Ten Tec Orion II with Flex 500A


That's probably enough to make the difference; I operate a lot of CW.

If the SSB performance is much better with the Flex, that might move me back
to undecided.

Thanks for your response.

Frank
KF6E

On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 3:02 PM, N4PY2 <n4py2@earthlink.net> wrote:

They are both great radios.  The biggest difference is on CW.  The Flex
radios have no CW QSK and the internal keyer in the Flex radios has latency
which makes using the internal keyer difficult.

Carl Moreschi N4PY
121 Little Bell Drive
Hays, NC 28635
www.n4py.com


----- Original Message -----
From: "Frank Kirschner" <kirschne@erols.com>
To: "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2010 2:50 PM
Subject: [TenTec] Comparison of Ten Tec Orion II with Flex 500A


> All,
>
> I realize that the two are very different realizations of transceivers,
> but
> from an operating standpoint, does anyone have any experience or
> observations? The cost is about the same for the two (or close > enough > that I'm considering them both). Which "works" better? Ability to > hear
> signals, ability to transmit a signal that will be heard?
>
> I've read reviews of both, but without hands-on experience, there's no
way
> for me to compare, and I don't want to buy both.
>
> Thanks.
>
> 73,
> Frank
> KF6E
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>