Thank you Rick. I enjoy QSK whatever the background noise is not too high. I
frequently have a noise level of about S7 on 80 m and 40m here in Florida. That
does not make for a great situation unless I turn the RF gain down
considerably. Otherwise it is quite distracting to send CW with the white noise
chuffing away in the background.
Best regards - Bry Carling
> On Mar 20, 2014, at 12:16 PM, "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de> wrote:
>
> Yes, you are correct, but when you add the terribly expensive external
> circuits, the amp no longer attempts to follow CW keying with its internal
> relay. The Ameritron amps can only run clean QSK with a $500 add-on, which
> my experience has been, are not real reliable. My experience is based on
> personal use for a few years, and knowledge of experience of several other
> members of my contesting club.
>
> If you want to run QSK at more than about 10 wpm, it would be better to
> purchase an amplifier with a high speed T/R relay. There are plenty of them
> on the market.
>
> I personally switched to a QSK Technologies amplifier. In fact I bought two
> of them. Never had any problems with them.
>
> Today I only have an older Ameritron (clone), the SB-1000, and I just don't
> run "full" QSK. For contests I set the timing such that I can hear between
> words. IMO, there is no tangible loss of functionality compared to full
> QSK.
> For normal non-contest QSOs I run about 1 second hang delay, which helps me
> keep what little bit of sanity I still have left.
>
> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Brian
> Carling
> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 5:03 PM
> To: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment
> Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
>
> Yes, but I think a lot of radio amateurs using good QSK Rigs like the Tentec
> have managed to convert their amplifiers for QSK operation by adding a
> circuitboard like the QSK 1500 or the QSK5.
>
> I realize that is more than just a simple homebrewer undertaking.
>
> Best regards - Bry Carling
>
>
>
>>> On Mar 20, 2014, at 11:51 AM, "Rick - DJ0IP / NJ0IP" <Rick@DJ0IP.de>
>> wrote:
>>
>> It's not quite that simple, at least not always.
>>
>> "IF" your amplifier has a very fast T/R relay, such as a vacuum relay,
>> then you are correct; a few simple switching transistors and a tiny
>> relay will do the trick. But that only works when the main T/R relay
>> is fast enough to follow CW keying.
>>
>> If instead you have an amplifier whose T/R relay needs 20 mS to
>> switch, AND you connect the hand-shaking just as the Ten-Tec keying
>> loop normally works, the CW is not going to be very smooth. Timing
>> will get screwed up. The open-frame relays are just too slow to do
>> that. The only way to make them work is to have hang delay such that they
> don't need to follow the keying.
>> The Ten-Tec hand-shaking does not do this.
>>
>> And then if you have to work with hang delay, you don't need the
>> complexity of the hand-shaking. You just need sufficient pre-dit
>> delay and adjustable hang delay - but you sacrifice true QSK.
>> TRUE QSK?
>> You never had it in the first place because you did not buy a QSK
> amplifier!
>>
>> No matter what you feed a mule or how you treat it, it will never be a
>> race horse!
>>
>> (On the other hand, not everybody needs or wants a race horse and
>> mules are wonderful animals!)
>>
>> 73 - Rick, DJ0IP
>> (Nr. Frankfurt am Main)
>>
>> -------------------------
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: TenTec [mailto:tentec-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of
>> bcarling@cfl.rr.com
>> Subject: Re: [TenTec] QSK or not?
>>
>> I have to wonder why some guys will spend $500 for an external
>> accessory to do QSK with their linear amplifier. The system in my TT
>> 422 is so simple. A couple of simple boards and a relay.
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> TenTec mailing list
>> TenTec@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
|