TenTec
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection

To: <geraldj@storm.weather.net>, "Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment" <tentec@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection
From: "Bob McGraw - K4TAX" <RMcGraw@Blomand.net>
Reply-to: Discussion of Ten-Tec Equipment <tentec@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:50:01 -0500
List-post: <tentec@contesting.com">mailto:tentec@contesting.com>
Oh, then there's those that tend to spoil things for the rest of us.

Bob


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dr. Gerald N. Johnson" <geraldj@storm.weather.net>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>
Sent: Sunday, April 19, 2009 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: [TenTec] Aux I/O connection


> On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 21:19 -0400, Martin Ewing wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Bob McGraw - K4TAX 
>> <RMcGraw@blomand.net>wrote:
>>
>> > ...  And oh by the way, my AM transmitter doesn't use any more
>> > sideband bandwidth than current technology SSB rigs and in many cases 
>> > it
>> > uses less.
>> >
>> > 73
>> > Bob, K4TAX
>> >
>>
>> I've been around since the AM era, myself, but I don't see how  DSB AM
>> doesn't take at least twice the bandwidth of  SSB for the same voice 
>> input.
>>
>> 73 Martin AA6E
>
> Except that some with dilusions of broadcast voice grandure transmit 6
> KHz or more of audio bandwidth.
>
> 73, Jerry, K0CQ
>
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
> 


_______________________________________________
TenTec mailing list
TenTec@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>