Hi George.
It's just the impression I get.
The FT-102 also has an adjustable width noise blanker, which seems to be
very effective on the QRM I described.
The TT's adjustable noise blanker doesn't deal with the described QRM as
effectively, and like yourself I've found that if you crank the width up too
far, the RX is muted.
I'll do some more comparisons.
Paul MW0CDO
----- Original Message -----
From: "Talbot, George A." <talbot@kmr.ll.mit.edu>
To: <tentec@contesting.com>; "'MW0CDO'" <gw7lhi@hotmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: [TenTec] OMNI V AGC audio hiss modification info
> Paul MW0CDO,
>
> <snip>
> > I'm afraid I know nothing about a noise blanker mod, but can tell you
that
> > the NB on the FT-102 is a whole lot more effective on fast narrow noise
> than
> > the TT one is. For example, someone in my street has one of those auto
> > ignition gas boilers which seems to try for about 30 seconds before the
> main
> > jet lights. The FT-102 NB can remove all traces of that interference,
yet
> > the TT NB doesn't do much at all.
> <snip>
>
> I am surprised to hear this about the OMNI, as my Paragon Noise blanker
> seems very effective against pulse ignition noise. Even when I was using
it
> briefly mobile I was pleasantly pleased with the noise blanker (the truck
I
> was using had a very noisy ignition). My "pulse width" control adjustment
> seems to help "fine tune" the response, and will completely blank the
> receiver when I turn it fully clockwise.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> George V73GT
> _______________________________________________
> TenTec mailing list
> TenTec@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
>
|