John,
Agreed and I gladly stand corrected! Other than my Omni D Series C
screw-up, how close was I to your findings and was it understandable?
I know what I MEANT to say, but did it come out right?
Steve
>At 05:04 PM 6/4/03 -0500, Steve Weber wrote:
>>Mark and the group,
>>
>>Third Generation:
>>
>>OMNI D Series C - (third generation digital readout. Analog was
>>not offered, so a lot of folks just call this an Omni C. Just to
>>confuse the rest of us, I guess!)
>>-------------------
>
>Steve,
>
>I challenge you to find anything from TenTec that refers to an "Omni
>D Series C". You won't find anything because it does not exits,
>except in the imaginations of some people. By the way, "a lot of
>folks just call this an Omni C" includes TenTec because they never
>made an Omni D Series C.
>
>Your statement above just perpetuates the myth that an Omni D Series C exits.
>
>Back in July of 2001 I went through all of my back issues of QST
>reading the TenTec advertisements. I then posted a message with the
>results of my little study. I wish the folks at the "Unofficial
>TenTec Pages" web site would correct their error.
>
>73..de John/K4WJ Owner of a TenTec Omni C purchased new from Texas
>Towers in May, 1981.
>73..de John/K4WJ
>***********************************************************
> John/K4WJ in Pembroke Pines, FL
> QTH 26 00 51 N
> 80 16 16 W
>
>K8PXG from 18 Jun 59 to 11 Feb 97
>K8WJ from 12 Feb 97 to 07 Apr 97
>ZF2HZ from 17 May 84 to 31 Dec 84
>***********************************************************
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>TenTec mailing list
>TenTec@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/tentec
--
Steve Weber
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However
a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|