But when you say, "copying" at 40, 50 or 60 wpm how is that
transcribed? One problem I'm guessing most have - I know I do - is
how the get the message down on paper at that speed. I can barely
write the letters fast enough above 20 wpm. If I could type faster,
and wore headphones, I could break that ceiling. That is, retrain my
reflexes to type the letter rather than write the letter. But what if
I'm on an island or mountain top with no typewriter....?
When I hear about recognizing words, that means developing a "CW
Word" vocabulary. I'm sure that is fine for the basic wham/Bam "ur
RST..., my name..., QTH...Tnx for FB QSO..73..." But to have a
ragchew about proposed Social Security schemes might introduce words
never encountered in CW before. Then what...?
So when you say you are "copying" at 40 wpm or above, are you saying
you can produce a transcript of exactly what was said - or is more a
less a "guess" within the realm or the abbreviated QSO above?
In my experience with computers, I find - despite the "you too can
become a programmer" sales pitch - that it takes a certain kind of
mind to write computer code. Some get it, some don't. But those that
don't are still very nice people.
It's hard for me to imagine that someone couldn't "get" 5 wpm code
speed - but If I was asked to draw even a very basic artistic
graphic, I'd be challenged. So we might all have our limits.
It's an interesting area - so many other modes besides CW these days
and the desire to require a basic floor of communication
proficiency....What if the DMV required everyone to pass their
driver's test using a standard shift vehicle....etc.
On to other things - have to put together a sales graphic for a
friend - fortunately I don't have to draw it. :-)
73,
Paul, K7NHB
|