Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: AM broadcast tower and 160m dxpedition

To: "'Joe Subich, W4TV'" <lists@subich.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: AM broadcast tower and 160m dxpedition
From: "Charlie Cunningham" <charlie-cunningham@nc.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2014 16:45:26 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Well, he's talking about going in November - maybe in time for CQWW CW -but
probably not.

-----Original Message-----
From: Topband [mailto:topband-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Joe
Subich, W4TV
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 4:10 PM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: AM broadcast tower and 160m dxpedition


 > Others can comment on whether 240 feet is too high.

240 feet tuned/matched with a parallel tuned tapped tank should
work quite well based on the information in K3LC's article in QEX
Nov/Dec 2013.   Of course, 240 feet would also make an excellent
support for a wire 4 square or parasitic array aimed back across
the center of the US (for ARRL 160).

73,

    ... Joe, W4TV


On 2/25/2014 3:38 PM, Richard Karlquist wrote:
> Congratulations on your adventure.
>
> In the past, I have seen some of these AM tower efforts
> ruined by lousy receive conditions.  I suggest you
> get an advance team out to the site to check
> out the noise level etc. and maybe put up some
> temporary beverages, loops, whatever and LISTEN
> on them.  Use WWV and WWVH on 2.5 MHz as a beacon.
>
> Others can comment on whether 240 feet is too high.
>
> Rick N6RK
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>