Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: strange propagation

To: "'Louis Parascondola'" <gudguyham@aol.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation
From: "Ed Sawyer" <sawyered@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: sawyered@earthlink.net
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 04:04:52 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
It would be hard to believe that the control operator is outside the US, beyond 
the FCC jurisdiction, and no one in the US is responsible.  If that is the 
case, its pretty scary in my opinion.

 

73

 

Ed  N1UR

 

From: Louis Parascondola [mailto:gudguyham@aol.com] 
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 3:28 AM
To: sawyered@earthlink.net; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation

 

I can't be 100% sure but I think this will all wash down to the fact that 
stations are no longer licensed and the control operator is fully responsible.  
And I do believe that is the case.  RHR has lawyers on retainer and I'm sure 
this has been legally looked at.  I can get the ruling they go by.

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail


-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
To: 'Louis Parascondola' <gudguyham@aol.com>; topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Fri, Jan 15, 2016 02:58 AM
Subject: RE: Topband: strange propagation



Correct, but if he doesn’t, its actually the primary responsibility of the 
control operator/station owner to shut down the station to prevent further 
illegal transmissions.

 

Ed  N1UR

 

From: Louis Parascondola [mailto:gudguyham@aol.com <mailto:gudguyham@aol.com?> 
] 
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 1:53 AM
To: sawyered@earthlink.net; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation

 

It is the same thing as if he was here physically, he must use his call with a 
/ w2 or whatever.  

Sent from AOL Mobile Mail


-----Original Message-----
From: Ed Sawyer <sawyered@earthlink.net>
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 11:39 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: strange propagation


In the case discussed of a station remoting in and not properly identifying
(ie an Italian station remoting a USA station but continuing to use the
Italian callsign), it seems to me that the FCC would consider the station
owner the control operator and therefore responsible for the proper IDing of
transmissions made from their station.



I would think a few fines issued by the FCC to the remote station holder,
would shut these games down in a hurry. I wonder if the RHR station owners
that are being leased out by individuals realize their liability in these
circumstances. I think some people will be shocked with a certified letter
at some point and the game will quickly change.



Ed N1UR

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>