To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: (no subject) |
From: | "Craig Clark" <jcclark@radiusnorth.net> |
Reply-to: | k1qx@arrl.net |
Date: | Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:45:18 -0500 |
List-post: | <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
I have often wondered (and never gotten an answer ) to the question "How does the forest affect the radiated signal?" Not enough that I would fret, worry or lose sleep over. I have almost 30 years of experience with a 110' top loaded transmitting antenna smack dab in the middle of a New England forest. Respectfully Craig Craig Clark K1QX Radioware PO Box 209 Rindge NH 03461 603 899 6957 NOTE NEW EMAIL ADDRESS JCCLARK@RADIUSNORTH.NET _______________________________________________ 160 meters is a serious band, it should be treated with respect. - TF4M |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: Topband: AAARRRAAGH ##$!@@!!, wb6rse1 |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: Topband: Trees And RF - Suggested Test, Pete Smith |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: Inverted L, Phil LaMarche |
Next by Thread: | Topband: (no subject), rfoxwor1 |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |