| To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Topband: QSB`ed opening |
| From: | "Guy Olinger, K2AV" <olinger@bellsouth.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Oct 2005 10:25:54 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:topband@contesting.com> |
... And for some reason the beverages were no advantage, had to use the phased verticals for most QSOs. ... Any theory on this? A propagation path that has a very high takeoff/incoming angle for access? If the phased verticals were better, what was the difference in the signal? 73, Guy. Scanned for viruses by Blue Coat http://www.WinProxy.com/ _______________________________________________ Topband mailing list Topband@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Topband: QRM from Asia, R March |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Topband: QSB`ed opening, Ian Keyser |
| Previous by Thread: | Topband: QSB`ed opening, df2py |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Topband: QSB`ed opening, Tom Rauch |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |