Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Topband: Sloper vs Top Driven Mast

To: "Topband Reflector" <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Topband: Sloper vs Top Driven Mast
From: "Greg - ZL3IX" <zl3ix@inet.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:20:25 +1300
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Hi Guys,

Some of you may be interested in the following.

Today I completed the change over from a sloper with its high point at 65ft, 
to a top driven mast arrangement.  I have been using the sloper ever since 
being QRV in ZL, and it has served me well.  I have always felt, however, 
that the horizontal field component radiated by the sloper was probably 
wasted under many propagation conditions.  I have been planning to change 
over to a top drive arrangement for a couple of years, but have only just 
completed the implementation.

The top drive arrangement was described by G3LNP in an April 2002 issue of 
RadComm.  I have referred to it previously on this Reflector.  In my case, I 
use a 3-element SteppIR as the top loading.  I have grounded the director 
and reflector to the boom to achieve more capacity, as the standard SteppIR 
comes with these floating.  For my mast height, EZNEC predicts an impedance 
of 37 - 300j, so I used a series inductor with about 1200 pF of shunt 
capacitance at the drive end.  (L match)  The resistive part of the 
simulated impedance was very close, but the reactance appeared about 15% 
higher than predicted, and I had to add about 4 turns on to the coil.

The SteppIR is insulated from the main mast by a 6 ft length of 2" 
fibreglass tube, and its control cable is wound with many turns on an old 
plastic cable drum, so that it doesn't shunt out the tuning inductor.  (Come 
to think of it, the shunt inductance of the control cable is probably what 
made the reactance appear higher than expected, as it is effectively in 
parallel with my tuning inductor) I switch over from straight through coax 
to the L match using two vacuum relays.  The whole arrangement is in a 
plastic box at the mast top.

I also measured the comparitive field strength of my ground wave at about 
1000m distance before and after the changeover.  I used a tuned loop, 
matching transformer, bandpass filter, and log amp.  I applied 10 W to the 
antenna under test in both cases.  In an easterly direction I found that the 
top driven mast was 2.5 dB better than the sloper, and in a northerly 
direction it was 3 dB better.  I would be interested to hear how people 
think that these ground wave measurements will correlate with DX 
performance.  With a relatively small change like that, the difference will 
be very difficult to estimate using on-air measurements, and an A-B test is 
out of the question because of interactions.

Let's hope for some improved condx so that I can try it out on the air.

73, Greg, ZL3IX 


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Topband: Sloper vs Top Driven Mast, Greg - ZL3IX <=