Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Coax Shield vs. Ground & elevated radials

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Coax Shield vs. Ground & elevated radials
From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>
Reply-to: Tom Rauch <w8ji@contesting.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 21:55:20 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
> When elevated radials are mentioned they are often full 
> 90-degree radials.
> The low impedance presented by the radials makes 
> decoupling the coaxial cable
> shield easy. The counterpoise current will divide between 
> the radial impedance
> and the shield impedance.

Maybe easy, but decoupling is still necessary if you want a 
clean and reliable installation. The notion a few 1/4 wl 
radials result in a perfectly unbalanced antenna is clearly 
false.

A commercial 40MHz groundplane using four 1/4 wl radials 
required significant  choking ( a few hundred ohms CM 
impedance) of the feedline shield *and* isolation of the 
radial common point to the mounting bracket. Without doing 
that common mode current was so bad SWR could change from 
1:1 to 2:1 just by altering the height of the supporting 
mast or length of the feedline.  The problem also applies to 
160 meter verticals as well as UHF groundplanes.

With elevated radials near earth there can be a dB or more 
FS reduction when the feedline shield is not decoupled.

This says nothing about the unwanted coupling of noise into 
the antenna, or RF into other devices close to the feedline 
or operated from the power line.

73, Tom 


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>