Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Beverages vs 4SQ

To: "Rudy Bakalov" <r_bakalov@yahoo.com>, <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Beverages vs 4SQ
From: "Tom McAlee" <tom@klient.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Oct 2006 00:41:01 -0400
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
>  I have never built either type of antenna  ...  I plan on buying all the 
> components from DX Engineering.

If you can put up both, go for it.

I have 3 of the DX Engineering reversible beverages (each 580', covering NE, 
E, SE, SW, W, NW) and one of the DXE 4 squares (98'/side per their 80/160 
compromise dimensions).

They all work very well.  Either can be better at a given time.  The 
Beverage antennas are better more often, but there are times when the 4 
square is better.  And, even during the times when a Beverage is better, if 
there is local QRM the 4 square's vastly better rejection of high angle 
signals makes it the better copy.

An example of that was CN2R on 160 tonight.  He was working simplex and had 
a decent pileup of USA stations.  While I heard him better on the Beverage, 
the USA guys were burying him.  On the 4 square, the S/N wasn't quite as 
good but the USA guys were way down.  I called and worked him on the first 
call.  Had I been listening on the Beverage, I probably would have had to 
wait for the pileup to shut up before I was able to tell he was calling me.

If I had to pick one or the other, I'd choose the beverages because the S/N 
is better there more often than the reverse.  But, having both is even 
better.

73,
Tom, NI1N


_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>