Hi Lee
My English is very weak.
I can't argue with you ..
1- I agree that there are very good RX antennas.
But I repeat - there are no super RX antennas.
2 - if there is a lot of industrial interference near your QTH, a good
RX antenna will not help.
3- Very weeks conditions - a good RX antenna similarly won't help ..
Try listening to Europe tomorrow at 13.00 - 15.00 UTC time.
I am sure there will be no result.
73
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Lee STRAHAN писал 2020-12-01 19:40:
Hmmm, Nick,
I beg to differ with you. I don’t care about scores or countries,
zones worked but I do care about 160 meter receiving antennas.
In my opinion your statement is dead wrong.
Not looking for a war of words or any more discussion. I will not
respond again about this.
Lee K7TJR
Hi-Z Antennas
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband <topband-bounces+k7tjr=msn.com@contesting.com> On Behalf
Of uy0zg
Sent: Tuesday, December 1, 2020 7:10 AM
To: peter.voelpel@t-online.de
Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband
<topband-bounces+uy0zg=mksat.net@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
Dr Peter
Super RX antennas for 160 m do not exist!
Exist :
- good conditions
- Quiet countryside
- Geography
Does not exist :
- Miracles
____________________________
I never envy. They envy me!
In CQ WW I only heard three from the USA - K7GM, W1KM, W3UA.
These are honest QSOs.
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
dj7ww@t-online.de писал 2020-12-01 16:38:
It´s amazing, the probably envious stations always suspect others with
their better antennas and perhaps better operation to use web sdr.
73
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Topband
[mailto:topband-bounces+dj7ww=t-online.de@contesting.com]
On
Behalf Of uy0zg
Sent: Dienstag, 1. Dezember 2020 14:19
To: Tom | SP5XO
Cc: topband@contesting.com; Topband
Subject: Re: Topband: CQWW a bust this year
Hi
Weeks conditions ?
For the best of the ex USSR countries, this is not a problem!
Very good HIGH + WEB SDR+ very kind and democratic American judges =
super result is ready!
http://lists.contesting.com/archives//html/3830/2020-11/msg08693.html
.........
73 !
---
Nick, UY0ZG
http://www.topband.in.ua
Tom | SP5XO ????? 2020-12-01 14:21:
Compare to recent weeks conditions were marginal during CQWW. Only
two Zone
4 stations were audible here and it took long time to work them.
Whereas a
week ago band was wide open from MI, IL to CO or even down to TX.
I worked only mults and Dx's this time. Only 13 stations from Zone 5
in my log. Except for VY2ZM all NA's were weak including KC1XX and
W3LPL!
Hopeful things improve for next weekend and will work some more in
ARRL 160.
CU
Tom
sp5xo
Conditions certainly didn't favor 160 over the weekend CQWW contest
here in
Florida at least.
Looking back in 2019 I worked 50 countries on 160 during CQWW, this
year it was only 17, only 3 Europeans and those were very weak. I'm
sure the lack of expeditions due to CV-19 played a part but on whole
I think many guys in hindsight will be glad they didn't spend the
money to go.
Maybe things will pick up next weekend for the ARRL 160 test though
that tends to be largely a USA to USA test and it is hard to hear
the DX through the local mob
CU guys in the pile up
Dave
NR1DX
--
Dave Manuals@ArtekManuals.com www.ArtekManuals.com
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|