Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues & Ideas for possible resolutio

To: "chris@g3svl.com" <chris@g3svl.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Digital mode spurious issues & Ideas for possible resolution
From: Mike Armstrong <armstrmj@aol.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:28:12 -0700
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
All..... herein lies THE major problem with putting the digital guys elsewhere. 
 JT-65 (and others of that ilk) are NOT ragchew modes.  They are really only 
useful for award chasing since what is sent is pretty much limited to calls, 
locations and signal strengths.  The guys using these modes (the JT series) 
aren't having lengthy conversations.  So shuttling them off to places that are 
used mainly for chewing the rag doesn't do them any good at all.  They are 
chasing states and DX.  

For anyone not familiar with the actual "content" of a JT65 QSO, go to the WSJT 
web site and take a look.  As I mentioned, the QSO "content" is pretty limited 
and meant for a specific purpose..... making and confirming a qso...... and 
that is about it.  I don't want to start a firestorm on ragchewing vs 
contest-type qsos..... I just wanted to inform those who may be unfamiliar with 
these modes that their purpose is TRULY dxing and state chasing, for lack of a 
better way to explain them.

Fair Winds
Mike (AB7ZU)

Kuhi no ka lima, hele no ka maka

> On Jan 2, 2014, at 13:16, Chris G3SVL <chris@g3svl.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 02/01/2014 18:20, Shoppa, Tim wrote:
>> I think we could encourage use of ARRL band plan, by not complaining when 
>> digital modes show up in 1800-1810.
> Tim,
> 
> That doesn't help those of us in Region 1 who don't have access to 1800 - 
> 1810?
> 
> 73 & HNY
> 
> Chris, G3SVL
> 
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>