Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux

To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Fishing beacons redux
From: mstangelo@comcast.net
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 17:21:01 +0000 (UTC)
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Is this the correct thing to do? How do you know that the beacon user is 
breaking the law in his jurisdiction?

In any case jamming should not be proposed as a solution. Amateur radio 
operators should not cause malicious interference.
 
If word got out that hams were jamming commercial fishermen it would give us a 
blabk eye. Remember, the public would perceive the fishermen using the beacons 
for their livelihood, and hams using these frequencies for a hobby.

The best thing to do is to provide the information to the ARRL Intruderwatch 
and maybe they can make a case to have the manufacturers delete channels in the 
160 meter band.

Mike N2MS

<snip>

"The most effective way to get rid of one is to operate on, or very close
to, the beacon frequency. It takes some period of time, but if the owner
can't hear the beacon reliably he will program a new frequency. Several
nights of heavy activity near a beacon often results in a channel switch.
... "

UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>