That is NOT ALL true, SOME stations are indeed other hams' stations and they
get a piece of the action based on what the monthly draw of revenue on the
station. However, MANY and the majority of the sites are owned by them. They
buy property all over and set up these stations. SO NOT ALL by any means are
other hams' stations.
I don't know whose actual station that is - but I'm sure it is someone's
> home station (just like all the others in the network).
>
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Blaschke, w5un <w5un@wt.net>
To: Carl Luetzelschwab <carlluetzelschwab@gmail.com>; topband
<topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Thu, Jan 14, 2016 1:15 am
Subject: Re: Topband: Strange propagation
I will say this:
operating a remote station (for money) owned and managed by someone else
will never be as satisfying as operating your own station, built by your
hands. But than again, if you have no station, and are unable to build
one up, what's your choice? I built (and rebuilt) a beautiful station
and antenna system here over the past fifteen years, only to see much of
it destroyed by storms in recent years. Now I am unable to rebuild anymore.
Dave, W5UN
On 1/14/2016 2:26 AM, Carl Luetzelschwab wrote:
> Ed N1UR said "It seems non-trivial to me as to how to maintain these remote
> stations."
>
> My guess is it was someone using the Portland, OR station in the Remote Ham
> Radio network (http://www.remotehamradio.com/the-stations/). The stations
> are available for a price.
>
> I don't know whose actual station that is - but I'm sure it is someone's
> home station (just like all the others in the network).
>
> Carl K9LA
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
>
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|