Hi all,
I started calling them around 0315z when they were peaking S9. That's very loud
considering the beverage has no noise. Using all of my learned skills I just
could not work them. I was using the second receiver, listening dual and trying
to find a frequency that seemed clear. The operator was working European
stations that I could not hear and then I heard him return to WA7NS who is loud
here. He came back to him twice and WA7NS responded both times but no joy. He
then came back to a PA2 station. Some minutes later he came back to WA7NS once
again and completed the QSO. I followed suite, called on the WA7 freq and
slowed down to 15 WPM. Immediate return.
Normally I would send at the same speed the DX is using but in this case the
slower speed worked better. Surprising to me is that "tail-ending" worked also.
Hint to the wise.
I do not believe that they are hearing very well, working one station (last
night) about every two to three minutes.
Good luck.LarryN7DD
-----Original Message-----
From: Wes <wes_n7ws@triconet.org>
To: topband <topband@contesting.com>
Sent: Tue, 26 Mar 2019 22:31
Subject: Re: Topband: XR0ZRC?
I was copying them last night on 160 about Q4 through the static crashes, but
judging by the size of the pileup on the panadaper screen and their widely
known
receiving problems I didn't bother to call with my peanut whistle. Of course
conventional wisdom says that I should not hear them without a RX antenna.
Their operators seem to be a mixed bag. On 40 meters about two weeks ago, they
were actually changing frequency every so often. I would think, where did they
go and then see on the scope they moved down a few dozen Hz. Unfortunately,
they
did this in the middle of what I thought was our QSO.
Wes N7WS
On 3/26/2019 12:37 PM, W7RH wrote:
> IMHO. Not just one but several Dxpeditions recently have had what seems like
> vacation style operating while promoted as full time full efforts. Some from
> hotels and resorts and some from less comfortable environments but subject to
> big city noise. With the decrease in solar activity you would think a little
> more low band effort would be in order. I don't think FT8 is the answer for
> them either. If they can't hear on CW their noise floor will be an issue in
> FT8 mode too. I'm sure someone will argue that point but if you can't work at
> least --18 then forget it.
>
> The XR0ZRC ops had a decent signal to the SW the last two evenings which was
> really their first major show on CW. I was able to copy them for more than 2
> hours each night until giving up.
>
> My thought is if you are going to run a KW and carry one along, then it would
> only make sense they carry some wire, coax and transformers in a bag as well.
> Shoot, even a K9AY could be carried in 3ft travel bag. While we can't make up
> for TS QRN man made noise is another and sometimes challenging issue. IMHO
>
> RX first....TX second....
>
> 73 bob, W7RH
>
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|