>From where I am in W3, the EU numbers in a Stew (including prestew and summer
>stew) seems highly variable. Many "good non contest nights" I work more EU
>than in a stew.
I would put reversibility high on your list because you could potentially pick
up more points from LP or QRP stations to the west, than from EU.
I myself hope to get my array of Two phased K9AYs back together.
Tim N3QE
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 5, 2016, at 12:26 PM, Matt Murphy <matt@nq6n.com> wrote:
>
> In preparation for the Stew I'm going to attempt to put up a small end fire
> array aimed at EU on my small suburban lot. There are a large number of
> books and articles about this topic, but my short-term goal is to build
> something simple that I can improve upon over the winter as time allows.
>
> I do not need the array to be switchable, since most of the points I'm
> likely to get would come from EU.
>
> I was thinking about creating three short verticals along the lines of the
> YCCC receive array (with active coupling) or using the W8JI recommended
> method with passive components.
>
> What approach to phasing makes the most sense given my simple requirements?
> Advice on spacing? What's the recommended approach to modeling a system
> like this to test subtle variations in phasing and spacing?
>
> 73,
> Matt NQ6N
> _________________
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_________________
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
|