I'm far from an FT8 expert* but on F/H mode the Fox does move the selected hound
to his frequency. If contact is not completed on the first sequence he will
move the hound to another frequency, rinse and repeat once more and you need to
start over.
To their credit, IMHO, P29RO is actually also working traditional RTTY. I now
have them on 5 bands on RTTY.
* A couple of my clubs have impromptu "competitions" on certain DXpeditions
where the scoring is the number of slots (band/modes). So if you want to
compete, you have to use FT8/FT4. I kick and scream and work them, but to date
I refuse to claim DXCC credit for the Qs. This has created a personal dilemma,
because my DXCC number 339 is Mt Athos on FT8. I haven't claimed it and
probably won't unless I work #340, Glorioso, which will probably never happen in
this lifetime.
Wes N7WS
On 11/5/2022 2:50 PM, Michael Tope wrote:
I am glad to hear T88WA is not at the hotel club station. The club station has
a low dipole on 160 which in the past has made a poor showing.
I managed to get a response from P29RO on 160 meter FT8 on Friday morning, but
didn't think it was a complete QSO. I am new to "hound" mode and WSJT-X kept
changing my transmit frequency. I think I was calling at 1086 Hz, and when I
got the response from P29RO, the program moved my TX frequency to match the
P29s QRG (504 Hz) and responded there. Not sure what was going on. In any
case, I was a bit stunned to see that I showed up in the P29 log. I suppose
our exchange meets the bare minimum for a QSO - their computer decoded my call
and signal report and my computer decoded theirs. Definitely not as satisfying
as a clean CW QSO, but I am pretty certain they were too weak for that. Much
of the time I wasn't decoding them and couldn't see them on the waterfall
display.
73, Mike W4EF....................
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
|