To: | <topband@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Topband: re : CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions.... |
From: | k6se@juno.com (k6se@juno.com) |
Date: | Thu, 18 Oct 2001 10:56:49 -0700 |
I wrote: "One simple answer might be that ARRL and CQ magazine indicate in their SSB contest rules that penalties will be assessed for US participants that use SSB below 1843 kHz during the contest(s)." ========== I took a lot of flak on that, and for good reasons given. Let's hope, then, that ARRL and CQ emphasizes in their contest rules that US participants should not operate on SSB below 1843 kHz. 73, de Earl, K6SE |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Topband: 160M Band Plan questions, Dinsterdog@aol.com |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Topband: re : CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions...., Frank Ayers |
Previous by Thread: | Topband: re : CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions...., Michael Keane, K1MK |
Next by Thread: | Topband: re : CQWW SSB & Our Continuing Bandplan Discussions...., Frank Ayers |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |