Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Norton preamp

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Norton preamp
From: shristov@ptt.yu
Reply-to: shristov@ptt.yu
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 14:47:28 CET
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Ford Peterson <ford@cmgate.com> wrote :

> I've been following this thread and took a look at Dallas Lankford's
> article.  It looks interesting.  And although &quot;...he seems to be very
> meticulous and conservative,&quot; he also boast of the magical 2N5109 preamp 
> as
> having an IP2 of +80dBm to +100dBm based on single versus P-P design (top of
> page 7).  I can absolutely, positively, beyond any reasonable doubt, assert
> that this is an absolute impossibility.  That's so fantastic I had to
> re-read it an actually ponder how big a signal that really is...
 
>  1W is +30dBm
> 1KW is +60dBm
> 1MW is +90dBm
 
> I can absolutely assert that anything looking like a 'circuit' in the signal
> path of 10 MegaWatts of RF will absolutely vaporize in a spectacular blue
> flame instantly.


Intercept Point values represent no real physical power.

They are rather arbitrary numbers calculated from distortion
measurement results. It is, therefore, perfectly possible to have
such a large numbers with low distortion, low power circuits.


73,

Sinisa  YT1NT, VE3EA









_______________________________________________
Topband mailing list
Topband@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/topband

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: Topband: Norton preamp, shristov <=