Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Inv L improvements question

To: m0els@yahoo.co.uk, Topband <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Inv L improvements question
From: F Z_Bruce <k1fz@myfairpoint.net>
Reply-to: k1fz@myfairpoint.net
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2019 10:41:31 -0500
List-post: <mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Unlike raised radials or a counterpoise...however,.........


Its better if the radials, if only a few, under ground are not resonant as the 
high impedance/ high voltage end  can loose a lots of energy to ground.

It is quite well known that a 'fat' (large diameter) antenna is lower Q,  is 
wider in  frequency , and depending upon physical width, is much lower 
impedance  and voltage at the top end. 


Similar to the fat antenna, An  'in ground' radial field can be made 'fat' by 
increasing the number of radials, avoiding the resonant length, and reducing 
the Q.    A perimeter wire around the far end of the radials can lower the 
impedance and voltage loss.

73
Bruce-k1fz
https://www.qsl.net/k1fz/beverage_antenna.html



On Sat, 19 Jan 2019 11:40:04 +0000 (UTC), John Randall via Topband wrote:

Can a radial(s) buried a couple of inches under the ground be tuned via an 
inductor and Can the radial all be connected to said inductor if they are the 
same length. Infact can it be done and is there any gain by doing this ?
73John - M0ELS
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
 
_________________
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>