Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: Thanks!

To: <topband@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: Thanks!
From: "Tom W8JI" <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Reply-to: Tom W8JI <w8ji@w8ji.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2013 22:07:49 -0400
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
Well, I haven't used 31 mix material for common-mode chokes or current
baluns, because I didn't have any - but it would be my choice. I used higher
frequency material because I had plenty of it - some in substantial sizes

31 isn't a magic cure-all, just as no other single material is. One of the most difficult things in the world is designing something that fits systems with conflicting goals.

When power levels increase, or when systems have very high voltages impressed across the choke, a higher Q material often works better. Tuner baluns are an example where theoretically optimum common mode impedance is traded off for reducing heat. If a balun melts down, it is useless.

The balun that never gets hot is a short circuit or perfect lossless reactance. The balun that has immunity to resonance is a balun that will melt down with certain load impedances.

The ARRL still doesn't have the issue of baluns on the inputs of tuners correct, so we have a long way to go in public education. There was a discussion on the Elecraft reflector where someone just got it wrong in an analysis, and an ARRL staffer used the flawed design analysis to justify a Handbook tuner with poor balance design.

Every system has to be looked at as a system.

73 Tom
All good topband ops know how to put up a beverage at night.
_________________
Topband Reflector

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>