Topband
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Topband: LOTW Participation

To: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Subject: Re: Topband: LOTW Participation
From: Eddy Swynar <deswynar@xplornet.ca>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 11:25:46 -0500
List-post: <topband@contesting.com">mailto:topband@contesting.com>
On 2012-02-17, at 11:01 AM, N1BUG wrote:

> "So by the same token, why would anyone deny the thrill of a LoTW 
> confirmation to a ham who may not be able to chase confirmations by more 
> traditional means? It costs nothing to upload to LoTW..."

Hi Paul,

And therein lies the rub...!

Imagine if you were mounting a DX-Pedition to some far-flung place, & your 
sponsors came up just short of all of your expenses---the balance would 
doubtlessly have to be covered by your own personal out-of-pocket monies...IF 
you QSL'ed by LotW.

On the other hand, the old-fashioned method of hard-copy QSL'ing presented an 
ideal venue to garner additional funds---and how many of us haven't 
appreciatively included an extra "green stamp", or two, in the envelope 
containing our own QSL card before posting it in the mail, as a final thanks 
for helping us "...get a new one"...? 

What avenue exists for the DX-pedition to secure extra $$$ that might encourage 
LotW QSL'ing...? The honour system...? While many of us remain, indeed, 
"honourable", Hams are, in the final analysis, mere humans---and human beings 
being what they are, I suspect that the majority would simply "...take the QSL 
and run."

There are advantages to anything new, AND dis-advantages...! The benefits of 
on-line electronic logging & QSL'ing could actually have a NEGATIVE effect upon 
the continuation of the very activity that it supposedly plays a role in 
benefitting.

~73~ de Eddy VE3CUI - VE3XZ

_______________________________________________
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>